'Oh, Shit. Did We Help Drive Her Crazy?'
We already know Andrew Bolt, The Professional Idiot, has no real sense of humour. He will join in with those who want to give "two fingers" to the Professionally Outraged, while his irony meter registers nothing. They're talking about Professionally Outraged people like you, you moron.
One of The Professional Idiot's favourite targets of his Professional Outrage, for at least two years, has been former stand-up comedian and professional comedy writer Catherine Deveny.
The Professional Idiot's not simply happy enough in feeding the paranoid 'Green Nazi' fantasies of his some of his most dedicated readers. He isn't content to merely dabble in blindingly obvious psychological media warfare tactics, with his constant sprinkling of the reaction words "rage", "hate" and "violence" all over stories he scratches out on his favoured targets. It's not enough to be the most prolific mainstream media distributor of fear and bigotry, as only the Professionally Outraged can do, Andrew Bolt now wants one of his favourite targets fired from her job, on the basis of unconfirmed gossip, when she may need that gig more than ever before :
"An unhappy columnist who writes what seems to me a plea for help, and who confesses she is indeed in trouble, should not be kept in harness by a newspaper hoping to win extra sales from her growing despair.""Help Her, Don't Exploit Her" The Professional Idiot writes...Andrew Bolt is so sympathetic.
The spreading of mainstream media claims that a columnist for The Age is suffering bipolar disorder begins, of course, with "the equally sympathetic Tim Blair."
This is how sympathetic Tim's been towards Catherine Denevy, a writer whose work he has been stuffing his blogs with for years :
"Deveny’s tiring brain sometimes suggests that she relocate to where stupid people dwell..."
"For just one week every year, the high-pitched shrieking noise coming out of Melbourne is produced by something other than Catherine Deveny:""Catherine Deveny is an idea-resistant bigot."
"Catherine seems unbalanced enough to seek Keating-resembling facial modifications."
"The woman is insane."
A light sampling of the dozens of times Blair has used Catherine Deveny columns as the litter tray upon which his readers shit comments about her politics, her weight, her sex life, her face, her vagina. There's less of that kind of thing now Blair is blogging for the Daily Telegraph. His readers can't even swear at her, not like the old days when Blair was an independent blogger.
The Professional Idiot, naturally, has been just as enthusiastic as Blair in unloading general nastiness and twisted interpretations of what the 'possibly bipolar' columnist has had to say :
"It turns out that what impresses her most is abuse."
Here's The Professional Idiot suggesting Deveny be prosecuted for writing about Catholicism. And that was back in February, 2007. Andrew Bolt has been on his Fire Catherine Deveny mission ever since.
In April, The Professional Idiot devoted much space to how "Hateful" Catherine Deveny is, thoroughly proving how embarrassingly simple his concept of satire actually is, and ensuring that when anyone enters Catherine Denevy's name into Google, the second or third thing they see is Bolt's headline "Hateful Columnist". Whose children wouldn't love to see that kind of branding on their mother's search engine results?
Now, just in case the already malicious gossip he and The Professional Idiot are spreading about Catherine Deveny, through the the Daily Telegraph and the Herald Sun, turns out to be actually true - neither 'journalist' used the miracles of e-mail or the telephone to confirm the claims they've published - Blair announces he will lay off :
Deveny’s columns...are a frequent target here. No more. Assuming the above account is accurate...Why just assume?
A commenter at Blair's nearly gags on the hypocrisy :
A day late and a dollar short Tim. Your contribution to Australian public life has been to make it more vicious, personal and psychologically destructive than it otherwise would have been.Blair and Bolt use hypocrisy for their own special hysteria.
You go beyond the forthright criticism or satire of other people’s ideas or points of view to burrow into their soul. The strategy got you back in the game after no-one would hire you, and it’s served you well.
But these mealy-mouthed declarations of ceasefire are hypocritical in the extreme - as hypocritical as your apparent shock that adversaries could take delight in your recent cancer.
How do you know which of your targets is dealing with problems or issues as bad or worse? Not everyone is as eager to share their diagnoses with the reading public as you are.
Has it ever occurred to you that if you have to stop a certain way of writing about someone because they’re ill, then the attacks were unwarrantedly vicious and destructive in the first place?
So thanks for the late fit of decency pal - maybe your illness has made you think a little more reflective about how you’ll be remembered. But maybe we’d all be a little better off if you found another outlet for whatever’s inside you that propelled you in this direction in the first place.
Of course, you’ll throw in stuff about no-holds-barred comment and free thinking etc, but everyone knows that your selling point is the infliction of pain.
Tim Blair and The Professional Idiot are having deep thoughts about whether they might have added to Deveny's mental load, or far worse, instigated some, or many, of the problems they seem to believe she is struggling through, with their tag-teaming, often personal attacks, in the blogs and the pages of two of Australia's biggest selling newspapers. Plus all those regularly vicious and downright nasty comments that their readers seem to be so fluent in.
What did they think would happen?
Of course they can. Isn't that the whole point of choosing a target and then going at it, week after week? To play with minds? Some disappointed readers of Blair and Bolt will wonder why they are now backing off, instead of finishing what they started.
The Professional Idiot thinks having an unconfirmed mental disorder is worthy of being fired from what could ultimately prove to be a most vital, important part of recovery. A job, a means of writing her way out of, or through, whatever is troubling her, if the unconfirmed claims from a blog comment that both Bolt and Blair are relying on turns out to be true.
Mental health issues rarely get the sort of coverage they deserve in the media, considering how widespread apparent depression, anxiety and suicidal behaviour is now in Australia.
More so-called mentally ill people should be writing for the mainstream media.
What happened to a diversity of views?
Why do only the apparently sane get to control debate in Australia?
The reason why the mainstream media that Blair and Andrew Bolt cling to is dying is because it can't compete anymore for entertainment value with the full-blooded rants and spectacular raves that can be found in the comments of hundreds of thousands of blogs every day. Theirs is a mostly Confected Outrage. And made safe for mainstream public consumption. Lawyers hover over everything Blair and Bolt now write. They are restrained, caged in, by their real, or professionally necessary, conservatism.
Writers like Catherine Deveny go further than Blair or Bolt would dare to, being easily frightened lads, and she manages to flare up the kind of devotion and blinding anger in her readers that Blair and Bolt long for, try so hard to inflame, but very rarely get.
Deveny is an original, perhaps that is what pains them both the most of all.
That and the lingering fear that she may have been having them both on, for years.
* I've posted the chunk I've deleted in comments below due to extreme verbosity.

13 comments:
Of course they're sympathetic. They know what it is like to be all fucked up in the head.
Isn't it obvious to those dipshits Caroline is pulling peoples chains?
If Catherine is really sick, my best wishes to her then. She shouldnt stop writing however.
I think you take Bolt too seriously, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with being bipolar, seems to come with the creative territory.
They hate her because she's a loud, opinionated, funny chick. Funnier than them!
Bolt is the most intolerant person in the Australian media today. He's got a problem with everything.
That's so funny he comes up with the best description of himself I've read. "professionally outraged."
The sweetest part is you know Tim Blair has read this.
What's your response, Tim?
I have always thought Catherine was putting it on. Doing so with much relish as well. These two cann't be that stupid can they?
I cut the below chunk from the original post because when I was reading it back, I started to think 'What the fuck is this guy on about?'
So it had to be moved here :
------------------
And since when has not having a mental disorder of some kind been a prerequisite for writing? Or blogging?
Some of the best novels ever written have been composed by brilliant loons, who learned to live (if not grew comfortable) with the chaos in their minds.
If writing everyday is a craft, then one of the best tools in the toolbox is not being altogether sane.
The internet is heaving with the kind of opinions, thoughts and rants that never would have been read by more than a local newspaper audience, or a crime scene investigator, only a few years ago.
And they are proving to be immensely popular.
Mainstream media columnists are not valued for their views much anymore, but as gateways to read what other people think, and usually the more outrageous the comments (to a point), the more excited the readers become.
Professional columnists have to compete for entertainment value with the wildly, often awesomely crazed blog commenter who drops the kind of word bomb load that turns group-think threads into beautiful chaos.
The apparently utterly crazy fuck who spectacularly unloads in a blog comment on a New York Times or London Times or Raw Story post, often gets read by more people than the story or columnist that inspired it.
Our humanity is richer for regularly hearing from those each of us might personally determine to be wallpaper lickers.
We want to hear what they have to say now, because so many of the old arguments about almost everything are cliched, boring, conversation stoppers.
Excellent post, Darryl. Well done.
Good stuff, Darryl. Their crocodile tears are just pathetic.
Great post, Darryl - and I'm glad you posted the part you had originally cut.
Catherine's column is, and will remain, one of the first parts of the Saturday Age that I read. I doubt that criticism by a couple of wingnuts is going to cause her any real anguish. If she has a mental disorder, it is more likely caused by other factors. Those two are simply not that good.
More right than you know Russ.
Catherine's columns are poorly written with childish and naive opinions. She also writes about standing over mirros to look at her privates to celebrate international women's day. If she is the first part of the paper that Russ reads, then he must seriously need to get a life.
Post a Comment