Personally, and coming from an old Australian family that had more than a few members serve during World War I, I think Paul Keating's 2013 "controversial" Remembrance Day speech was one of the finest ever given on the awful human disaster that robbed Australian of so many young men, and left us saddled with an Imperial War debt in the hundreds of millions of pounds. And for what?
Paul Keating, November 11, 2013:
Nine months from now, one hundred years ago, the horror of all ages came together to open the curtain on mankind's greatest century of violence the twentieth century.
What distinguished the First World War from all wars before it was the massive power of the antagonists.
Modern weaponry, mass conscription and indefatigable valour produced a cauldron of destruction the likes of which the world had never seen.
The statesmen who had set these forces in motion had never assumed that their conflict might be limited only by the scale of their young populations. They failed to understand how developing industrial organisation, railways, science and rising productive capacity rendered almost inexhaustible the ability of each to deliver the death blow and keep on delivering it.
The generals, especially the Allied ones, knew through military training that not since the Napoleonic Wars had frontal attacks been effective certainly not against the foil of barbed wire fortified by the modern machine gun. Yet, a line of trenches was dug, from the English Channel to the Swiss Alps - a front which denied commanders the opportunity of that classic military manoeuvre - the turning flank and encirclement. This denied, the line was fortified by major cannon and howitzers, while
the generals fell back on the only policy left to them - the policy of exhaustion.
And into this deadly crevice they fed their heroic, young obedient populations.
The First World War was a war devoid of any virtue. It arose from the quagmire of European tribalism. A complex interplay of nation state destinies overlaid by notions of cultural superiority peppered with racism.
The First World War not only destroyed European civilisation and the empires at its heart; its aftermath led to a second conflagration, the Second World War, which divided the continent until the end of the century.
But at the end of the century, from the shadows, a new light emerged. Europe turned its back on the nation state to favour a greater European construct. Individual loyalties are now directed from nationalist obsessions toward an amorphous whole and to institutions unlikely to garner a popular base. It is difficult to imagine these days, young Europeans going into combat for the European Commission, or at a stretch, the European Parliament.
This advent means that European leaders are no longer in a position to ask or demand the sacrifices which once attended their errant foreign policies. A century beyond Armageddon, young men and women are now freed from that kind of tyranny.
The virulent European disease of cultural nationalism and ethnic atavism not only destroyed Europe, it destroyed the equilibrium of the world.
While a century ago Australia was an outreach of European civilisation, here we had set about constructing an image of ourselves, free of the racial hatreds and contempts which characterised European society.
Though White Australia institutionalised a policy of bias to Caucasians; within Australia we were moving through the processes of our federation to new ideas of ourselves. Notions of equality and fairness suffrage for women, a universal living wage, support in old age, a sense of inclusive
patriotism.
And our sense of nation brought new resonances; Australian stories, poetry and ideas of our Australian-ness. We even developed a celebratory decorative style in our architecture and named that Federation. We had crystallised a good idea of ourselves and had begun to break free of the dismal legacy of Europe's ethnic stigmatisation and social stratification.
By 1915 we had no need to re-affirm our European heritage at the price of being dragged to a European holocaust. We had escaped that mire, both sociologically and geographically. But out of loyalty to imperial Britain, we returned to Europe's killing fields to decide the status of
Germany, a question which should earlier have been settled by foresight and statecraft.
Those bloody battles in Flanders, on the Western Front and at Gallipoli nevertheless distinguished us, demonstrating what we were made of. Our embrace of a new sense of human values and relationships through these events, gave substance to what is now the Anzac tradition. For whatever claims Britain and its empire had on those who served and died on the Western Front and at Gallipoli, the primary claim remained Australia's.
Those Australians fought and died not in defence of some old world notion of competing empires and territorial conquests but for the new world the one they belonged to and hoped to return to.
This is why Australia was never in need of any redemption at Gallipoli, any more than it was in need of one at Kokoda thirty years later. There was nothing missing in our young nation or our idea of it that required the martial baptism of a European cataclysm to legitimise us.
What the Anzac legend did do, by the bravery and sacrifice of our troops, was reinforce our own cultural notions of independence, mateship and ingenuity. Of resilience and courage in adversity. We liked the lesson about supposedly ordinary people; we liked finding that they were not ordinary at all. Despite the fact that the military campaigns were shockingly flawed and incompetently executed, those ordinary people distinguished themselves by their latent nobility.
The unknown Australian soldier interred in this memorial reminds us of these lessons as much as he reminds us of the more than 100,000 Australians lost to us by war.
I regard as a singular honour, the decision by the Council of the War Memorial to permanently display an engraving of the oration I gave as Prime Minister at the funeral service of the unknown Australian soldier on 11 November 1993. And to have some words from that oration inscribed
on that hallowed tomb. My time as Prime Minister spanned the period of the Pacific War, 1941 to 1945, fifty years on. It caused me to visit the sites of our military action from Papua New Guinea through to Thailand. It made me think much and write about the various episodes of conflict,
of the bravery and suffering of Australian service men and women during the Second World War.
This context sharpened the memory and essence of the Anzac legend, within which it was decided to inter an unnamed, unknown Australian soldier in the Memorial's Hall of Memory.
Indeed, the War Memorial's then director, Brendan Kelson and his deputy, Michael McKiernan, were instrumental in the process that led to the interment of the soldier.
The words the Memorial enshrines today were written for that occasion.
When Don Watson and I first discussed the writing of it, we both felt the poignancy of the occasion. My uncle, William Keating, had died in 1945 on the death march from Sandakan to Ranau, while Don Watson's grandfather was twice wounded in Flanders after being infected with Spanish flu. He returned to Australia, never recovering from it.
The history of those two theatres of war had haunted each of our lives in differing yet similar ways.
I thought it important that the speech express with clarity, simple notions of understanding and appreciation that went in personal terms, such that we might have been speaking of a relative who had died in some contemporary calamity. Hence the notion that he was all of them yet one of us.
By his interment, I thought it important to say that this unknown Australian soldier would serve his country yet again. That his presence would give us a deeper understanding of what it means to be Australian as well as serving to remind us of the sacrifice of the more than one hundred thousand men and women who never came home.
As Prime Minister, I was particularly pleased to bring these episodes of our history, especially the First and Second World Wars, into sharper relief. To remind us that the deeds of our men and women at war give us an opportunity to renew our belief in the country, while renewing our appreciation of their faith, loyalty and sacrifice.
The soul of a nation is the richer for it having been warmed by its stories and traditions. Yet its stories and traditions should not stifle or constrain its growth as it needs to adapt.
I am greatly heartened that so many young Australians find a sense of identity and purpose from the Anzac legend and from those Australian men and women who have fought in wars over the last hundred years. But the true commemoration of their lives, service and sacrifice is to understand that the essence of their motivation was their belief in all we had created here and our responsibility in continuing to improve it.
Homage to these people has to be homage to them and about them and not to some idealised or jingoist reduction of what their lives really meant.
One thing is certain: young Australians, like the young Europeans I mentioned earlier, can no longer be dragooned en masse into military enterprises of the former imperial variety on the whim of so-called statesmen. They are fortunately too wise to the world to be cannon fodder of the kind their young forebears became: young innocents who had little or no choice.
Commemorating these events should make us even more wary of grand ambitions and grand alliances of the kind that fractured Europe and darkened the twentieth century. In the long shadow of these upheavals, we gather to ponder their meaning and to commemorate the values that shone in their wake: courage under pressure, ingenuity in adversity, bonds of mateship and above all, loyalty to Australia.
There is a lot more to be said about Australia's role, and sacrifice, in World War I, and boy, are we sure going to hear about it this year. All year long.
NINE
months from now, one hundred years ago, the horror of all ages came
together to open the curtain on mankind's greatest century of violence
the twentieth century.
What distinguished the First World War from all wars before it was the massive power of the antagonists.
Modern
weaponry, mass conscription and indefatigable valour produced a
cauldron of destruction the likes of which the world had never seen.
The
statesmen who had set these forces in motion had never assumed that
their conflict might be limited only by the scale of their young
populations. They failed to understand how developing industrial
organisation, railways, science and rising productive capacity rendered
almost inexhaustible the ability of each to deliver the death blow and
keep on delivering it.
The generals, especially the Allied ones,
knew through military training that not since the Napoleonic Wars had
frontal attacks been effective certainly not against the foil of barbed
wire fortified by the modern machine gun. Yet, a line of trenches was
dug, from the English Channel to the Swiss Alps - a front which denied
commanders the opportunity of that classic military manoeuvre - the
turning flank and encirclement. This denied, the line was fortified by
major cannon and howitzers, while the generals fell back on the only
policy left to them - the policy of exhaustion.
And into this deadly crevice they fed their heroic, young obedient populations.
The
First World War was a war devoid of any virtue. It arose from the
quagmire of European tribalism. A complex interplay of nation state
destinies overlaid by notions of cultural superiority peppered with
racism.
The First World War not only destroyed European
civilisation and the empires at its heart; its aftermath led to a second
conflagration, the Second World War, which divided the continent until
the end of the century.
But at the end of the century, from the
shadows, a new light emerged. Europe turned its back on the nation state
to favour a greater European construct. Individual loyalties are now
directed from nationalist obsessions toward an amorphous whole and to
institutions unlikely to garner a popular base. It is difficult to
imagine these days, young Europeans going into combat for the European
Commission, or at a stretch, the European Parliament.
This advent
means that European leaders are no longer in a position to ask or
demand the sacrifices which once attended their errant foreign policies.
A century beyond Armageddon, young men and women are now freed from
that kind of tyranny.
The virulent European disease of cultural
nationalism and ethnic atavism not only destroyed Europe, it destroyed
the equilibrium of the world.
While a century ago Australia was
an outreach of European civilisation, here we had set about constructing
an image of ourselves, free of the racial hatreds and contempts which
characterised European society. Though White Australia institutionalised
a policy of bias to Caucasians; within Australia we were moving through
the processes of our federation to new ideas of ourselves. Notions of
equality and fairness suffrage for women, a universal living wage,
support in old age, a sense of inclusive patriotism.
And our
sense of nation brought new resonances; Australian stories, poetry and
ideas of our Australian-ness. We even developed a celebratory decorative
style in our architecture and named that Federation. We had
crystallised a good idea of ourselves and had begun to break free of the
dismal legacy of Europe's ethnic stigmatisation and social
stratification.
By 1915 we had no need to re-affirm our European
heritage at the price of being dragged to a European holocaust. We had
escaped that mire, both sociologically and geographically. But out of
loyalty to imperial Britain, we returned to Europe's killing fields to
decide the status of Germany, a question which should earlier have been
settled by foresight and statecraft.
Those bloody battles in
Flanders, on the Western Front and at Gallipoli nevertheless
distinguished us, demonstrating what we were made of. Our embrace of a
new sense of human values and relationships through these events, gave
substance to what is now the Anzac tradition. For whatever claims
Britain and its empire had on those who served and died on the Western
Front and at Gallipoli, the primary claim remained Australia's.
Those
Australians fought and died not in defence of some old world notion of
competing empires and territorial conquests but for the new world the
one they belonged to and hoped to return to.
This is why
Australia was never in need of any redemption at Gallipoli, any more
than it was in need of one at Kokoda thirty years later. There was
nothing missing in our young nation or our idea of it that required the
martial baptism of a European cataclysm to legitimise us.
What
the Anzac legend did do, by the bravery and sacrifice of our troops, was
reinforce our own cultural notions of independence, mateship and
ingenuity. Of resilience and courage in adversity. We liked the lesson
about supposedly ordinary people; we liked finding that they were not
ordinary at all. Despite the fact that the military campaigns were
shockingly flawed and incompetently executed, those ordinary people
distinguished themselves by their latent nobility.
The unknown
Australian soldier interred in this memorial reminds us of these lessons
as much as he reminds us of the more than 100,000 Australians lost to
us by war.
I regard as a singular honour, the decision by the
Council of the War Memorial to permanently display an engraving of the
oration I gave as Prime Minister at the funeral service of the unknown
Australian soldier on 11 November 1993. And to have some words from that
oration inscribed on that hallowed tomb. My time as Prime Minister
spanned the period of the Pacific War, 1941 to 1945, fifty years on. It
caused me to visit the sites of our military action from Papua New
Guinea through to Thailand. It made me think much and write about the
various episodes of conflict, of the bravery and suffering of Australian
service men and women during the Second World War.
This context
sharpened the memory and essence of the Anzac legend, within which it
was decided to inter an unnamed, unknown Australian soldier in the
Memorial's Hall of Memory.
Indeed, the War Memorial's then
director, Brendan Kelson and his deputy, Michael McKiernan, were
instrumental in the process that led to the interment of the soldier.
The words the Memorial enshrines today were written for that occasion.
When
Don Watson and I first discussed the writing of it, we both felt the
poignancy of the occasion. My uncle, William Keating, had died in 1945
on the death march from Sandakan to Ranau, while Don Watson's
grandfather was twice wounded in Flanders after being infected with
Spanish flu. He returned to Australia, never recovering from it.
The history of those two theatres of war had haunted each of our lives in differing yet similar ways.
I
thought it important that the speech express with clarity, simple
notions of understanding and appreciation that went in personal terms,
such that we might have been speaking of a relative who had died in some
contemporary calamity. Hence the notion that he was all of them yet one
of us.
By his interment, I thought it important to say that this
unknown Australian soldier would serve his country yet again. That his
presence would give us a deeper understanding of what it means to be
Australian as well as serving to remind us of the sacrifice of the more
than one hundred thousand men and women who never came home.
As
Prime Minister, I was particularly pleased to bring these episodes of
our history, especially the First and Second World Wars, into sharper
relief. To remind us that the deeds of our men and women at war give us
an opportunity to renew our belief in the country, while renewing our
appreciation of their faith, loyalty and sacrifice.
The soul of a
nation is the richer for it having been warmed by its stories and
traditions. Yet its stories and traditions should not stifle or
constrain its growth as it needs to adapt.
I am greatly heartened
that so many young Australians find a sense of identity and purpose
from the Anzac legend and from those Australian men and women who have
fought in wars over the last hundred years. But the true commemoration
of their lives, service and sacrifice is to understand that the essence
of their motivation was their belief in all we had created here and our
responsibility in continuing to improve it.
Homage to these
people has to be homage to them and about them and not to some idealised
or jingoist reduction of what their lives really meant.
One
thing is certain: young Australians, like the young Europeans I
mentioned earlier, can no longer be dragooned en masse into military
enterprises of the former imperial variety on the whim of so-called
statesmen. They are fortunately too wise to the world to be cannon
fodder of the kind their young forebears became: young innocents who had
little or no choice.
Commemorating these events should make us
even more wary of grand ambitions and grand alliances of the kind that
fractured Europe and darkened the twentieth century. In the long shadow
of these upheavals, we gather to ponder their meaning and to commemorate
the values that shone in their wake: courage under pressure, ingenuity
in adversity, bonds of mateship and above all, loyalty to Australia.
- See more at:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/policy/paul-keatings-remembrance-day-commemorative-address/story-e6frg8yo-1226757270589#sthash.16vxOzMf.dpuf
NINE
months from now, one hundred years ago, the horror of all ages came
together to open the curtain on mankind's greatest century of violence
the twentieth century.
What distinguished the First World War from all wars before it was the massive power of the antagonists.
Modern
weaponry, mass conscription and indefatigable valour produced a
cauldron of destruction the likes of which the world had never seen.
The
statesmen who had set these forces in motion had never assumed that
their conflict might be limited only by the scale of their young
populations. They failed to understand how developing industrial
organisation, railways, science and rising productive capacity rendered
almost inexhaustible the ability of each to deliver the death blow and
keep on delivering it.
The generals, especially the Allied ones,
knew through military training that not since the Napoleonic Wars had
frontal attacks been effective certainly not against the foil of barbed
wire fortified by the modern machine gun. Yet, a line of trenches was
dug, from the English Channel to the Swiss Alps - a front which denied
commanders the opportunity of that classic military manoeuvre - the
turning flank and encirclement. This denied, the line was fortified by
major cannon and howitzers, while the generals fell back on the only
policy left to them - the policy of exhaustion.
And into this deadly crevice they fed their heroic, young obedient populations.
The
First World War was a war devoid of any virtue. It arose from the
quagmire of European tribalism. A complex interplay of nation state
destinies overlaid by notions of cultural superiority peppered with
racism.
The First World War not only destroyed European
civilisation and the empires at its heart; its aftermath led to a second
conflagration, the Second World War, which divided the continent until
the end of the century.
But at the end of the century, from the
shadows, a new light emerged. Europe turned its back on the nation state
to favour a greater European construct. Individual loyalties are now
directed from nationalist obsessions toward an amorphous whole and to
institutions unlikely to garner a popular base. It is difficult to
imagine these days, young Europeans going into combat for the European
Commission, or at a stretch, the European Parliament.
This advent
means that European leaders are no longer in a position to ask or
demand the sacrifices which once attended their errant foreign policies.
A century beyond Armageddon, young men and women are now freed from
that kind of tyranny.
The virulent European disease of cultural
nationalism and ethnic atavism not only destroyed Europe, it destroyed
the equilibrium of the world.
While a century ago Australia was
an outreach of European civilisation, here we had set about constructing
an image of ourselves, free of the racial hatreds and contempts which
characterised European society. Though White Australia institutionalised
a policy of bias to Caucasians; within Australia we were moving through
the processes of our federation to new ideas of ourselves. Notions of
equality and fairness suffrage for women, a universal living wage,
support in old age, a sense of inclusive patriotism.
And our
sense of nation brought new resonances; Australian stories, poetry and
ideas of our Australian-ness. We even developed a celebratory decorative
style in our architecture and named that Federation. We had
crystallised a good idea of ourselves and had begun to break free of the
dismal legacy of Europe's ethnic stigmatisation and social
stratification.
By 1915 we had no need to re-affirm our European
heritage at the price of being dragged to a European holocaust. We had
escaped that mire, both sociologically and geographically. But out of
loyalty to imperial Britain, we returned to Europe's killing fields to
decide the status of Germany, a question which should earlier have been
settled by foresight and statecraft.
Those bloody battles in
Flanders, on the Western Front and at Gallipoli nevertheless
distinguished us, demonstrating what we were made of. Our embrace of a
new sense of human values and relationships through these events, gave
substance to what is now the Anzac tradition. For whatever claims
Britain and its empire had on those who served and died on the Western
Front and at Gallipoli, the primary claim remained Australia's.
Those
Australians fought and died not in defence of some old world notion of
competing empires and territorial conquests but for the new world the
one they belonged to and hoped to return to.
This is why
Australia was never in need of any redemption at Gallipoli, any more
than it was in need of one at Kokoda thirty years later. There was
nothing missing in our young nation or our idea of it that required the
martial baptism of a European cataclysm to legitimise us.
What
the Anzac legend did do, by the bravery and sacrifice of our troops, was
reinforce our own cultural notions of independence, mateship and
ingenuity. Of resilience and courage in adversity. We liked the lesson
about supposedly ordinary people; we liked finding that they were not
ordinary at all. Despite the fact that the military campaigns were
shockingly flawed and incompetently executed, those ordinary people
distinguished themselves by their latent nobility.
The unknown
Australian soldier interred in this memorial reminds us of these lessons
as much as he reminds us of the more than 100,000 Australians lost to
us by war.
I regard as a singular honour, the decision by the
Council of the War Memorial to permanently display an engraving of the
oration I gave as Prime Minister at the funeral service of the unknown
Australian soldier on 11 November 1993. And to have some words from that
oration inscribed on that hallowed tomb. My time as Prime Minister
spanned the period of the Pacific War, 1941 to 1945, fifty years on. It
caused me to visit the sites of our military action from Papua New
Guinea through to Thailand. It made me think much and write about the
various episodes of conflict, of the bravery and suffering of Australian
service men and women during the Second World War.
This context
sharpened the memory and essence of the Anzac legend, within which it
was decided to inter an unnamed, unknown Australian soldier in the
Memorial's Hall of Memory.
Indeed, the War Memorial's then
director, Brendan Kelson and his deputy, Michael McKiernan, were
instrumental in the process that led to the interment of the soldier.
The words the Memorial enshrines today were written for that occasion.
When
Don Watson and I first discussed the writing of it, we both felt the
poignancy of the occasion. My uncle, William Keating, had died in 1945
on the death march from Sandakan to Ranau, while Don Watson's
grandfather was twice wounded in Flanders after being infected with
Spanish flu. He returned to Australia, never recovering from it.
The history of those two theatres of war had haunted each of our lives in differing yet similar ways.
I
thought it important that the speech express with clarity, simple
notions of understanding and appreciation that went in personal terms,
such that we might have been speaking of a relative who had died in some
contemporary calamity. Hence the notion that he was all of them yet one
of us.
By his interment, I thought it important to say that this
unknown Australian soldier would serve his country yet again. That his
presence would give us a deeper understanding of what it means to be
Australian as well as serving to remind us of the sacrifice of the more
than one hundred thousand men and women who never came home.
As
Prime Minister, I was particularly pleased to bring these episodes of
our history, especially the First and Second World Wars, into sharper
relief. To remind us that the deeds of our men and women at war give us
an opportunity to renew our belief in the country, while renewing our
appreciation of their faith, loyalty and sacrifice.
The soul of a
nation is the richer for it having been warmed by its stories and
traditions. Yet its stories and traditions should not stifle or
constrain its growth as it needs to adapt.
I am greatly heartened
that so many young Australians find a sense of identity and purpose
from the Anzac legend and from those Australian men and women who have
fought in wars over the last hundred years. But the true commemoration
of their lives, service and sacrifice is to understand that the essence
of their motivation was their belief in all we had created here and our
responsibility in continuing to improve it.
Homage to these
people has to be homage to them and about them and not to some idealised
or jingoist reduction of what their lives really meant.
One
thing is certain: young Australians, like the young Europeans I
mentioned earlier, can no longer be dragooned en masse into military
enterprises of the former imperial variety on the whim of so-called
statesmen. They are fortunately too wise to the world to be cannon
fodder of the kind their young forebears became: young innocents who had
little or no choice.
Commemorating these events should make us
even more wary of grand ambitions and grand alliances of the kind that
fractured Europe and darkened the twentieth century. In the long shadow
of these upheavals, we gather to ponder their meaning and to commemorate
the values that shone in their wake: courage under pressure, ingenuity
in adversity, bonds of mateship and above all, loyalty to Australia.
- See more at:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/policy/paul-keatings-remembrance-day-commemorative-address/story-e6frg8yo-1226757270589#sthash.16vxOzMf.dpuf
