Immeasurable Hurt DeHurtedAccording to Daily Telegraph associate editor, Tim Blair, the "Graceless & Weird" defamation suit he lodged against Crikey publisher Eric Beecher
 is now "Case Closed."Here's the April 2, 2009, 
apology on the Pure Poison blog at Crikey that was deemed not satisfactory enough :
In  a post last night titled “Sockpuppet Worn” it was suggested that  enthusiastic Pure Poison critic “WB"....had been making comments from  Tim Blair’s private IP adress. The post, now removed from the Crikey  site, included speculation on the identity of WB, concluding that it was  Blair. Tim denies this flatly, and notes that people in the same house  would share an IP. Commenters to the original deleted post had also made  that point.  We don’t know any more than that WB comments from the same  private IP. Our criticisms are reserved for whoever “WB” turns out to  be.  We unreservedly withdraw any allegation that Tim has been using the  “WB” identity, that he had personally used this identity to  artificially boost his “hits”, and apologise for any offence caused by  the above.
That apology, for an incorrect story that was online for all of a couple of hours, did not soothe the immeasurable hurt caused, apparently, so twelve months later Crikey publishes another apology, this time written (or at least guided) by Blair's lawyers.
The April 12, 2010, 
apology on the Pure Poison blog at Crikey :
  On 1 March 2009, an article entitled “Sockpuppet Worn” was published  on this blog about Mr Tim Blair that was incorrect. The article wrongly  suggested that Mr Blair publishes comments under a pseudonym on his blog  and various other blogs to make them appear as if they were independent  reader comments.
 It also falsely suggested that Mr Blair is dishonest in that, by  publishing comments under a pseudonym on his own blog, he artificially  boosts his blog readership and visit numbers, and that Mr Blair is  unprofessional in his conduct as a journalist.
 Crikey and the authors of this blog acknowledge that each of  these suggestions are false and that there is no basis for any of them.  We withdraw them unreservedly and acknowledge that Mr Blair has acted  properly at all times. We apologise to Mr Blair for the hurt and  distress caused.
       The assumption is that a cash settlement was part of the ap0logy. But it's hard to know for sure, because tabloid journalists, despite often writing articles that blow up to headlines the most insignificant details of peoples' private lives, don't like to talk or give quotes when they become part of a story. They don't even want others to comment or discuss such stories :

Blair's lawyer friend WB -
 Wogblogger - cracks the champagne :
 (click to enlarge)
(click to enlarge) And
 gloats about the settlement on any number of blogs :
....he’s sued a superrich publisher. Epic fail on the hypocrisy argument and  no points for trying.  And the ‘glass jaw’ argument......is just  historical revisionism at its finest. Blair has taken more abuse than  most over the years. I think you’ll find Tim Blair’s reputation is as  the guy who cracked Crikey’s deep pockets (that’s Private Media = worth  >$6m), which in journalistic circles makes him some sort of a God.
Some sort of a
 God.....